<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Geeking out! &#187; Social</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.babler.us/michael/category/social/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.babler.us/michael</link>
	<description>Tech, toys, games, and other minor obsessions.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 14:00:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google+ (it&#8217;s all about the circles baby)</title>
		<link>http://blog.babler.us/michael/2011/07/11/google_plus/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.babler.us/michael/2011/07/11/google_plus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.babler.us/michael/?p=340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I managed to nab a Google+ (G+) account this week, and its looking like a solid product.  I haven&#8217;t used Facebook in more than a year so I can&#8217;t really compare the two.  I will say that if Facebook had had Circles I probably wouldn&#8217;t have left.  G+ doesn&#8217;t have 3rd party apps yet, I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I managed to nab a Google+ (G+) account this week, and its looking like a solid product.  I haven&#8217;t used Facebook in more than a year so I can&#8217;t really compare the two.  I will say that if Facebook had had Circles I probably wouldn&#8217;t have left.  G+ doesn&#8217;t have 3rd party apps yet, I don&#8217;t know if they intend to, but I assume so.  If G+ does start allowing 3rd party apps, information security will be a very telling feature.  A strong focus on allowing information control will make G+ a solid service for me.  Circles seems to provide that control, and Circles appears to be the core functionality upon which G+ is built.  All they really have to do is continue to follow this model with all aspects of their service to keep me a believer.</p>
<p>I will take this opportunity to mention that because Google is kind of dumb and does not yet support their own service (Google Apps).  So for the moment I am using G+ through one of my old gmail accounts.  This bugs me as I assume I will have to re-do all my G+ settings when I move back to my primary account as well as lose all my history.  History may in fact not be important, I assume stuff that is older than a couple of days will not be looked at ever again, but I like the idea that I could.  It&#8217;s true that G+ does currently have a data export feature, but currently has no import feature.</p>
<p>As a application it seems that G+ still has a ways to go before it will be done.  There are some obvious enhancements which I can only assume will come in time.  I am making suggestions as I find them.  I am looking forward to having a social interaction that a larger number of friends and family members will have access to (most people I know have a gmail account).  Even the limited interactions I&#8217;ve had with people so far has been fun.  I will re-evaluate as we go along, but it looks like a solid service, and I have high hopes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.babler.us/michael/2011/07/11/google_plus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This is important: software patents</title>
		<link>http://blog.babler.us/michael/2010/06/28/this-is-important-software-patents/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.babler.us/michael/2010/06/28/this-is-important-software-patents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.babler.us/michael/?p=230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20100628100422167 There is a large legal door being left open here, but this is still an important decision regarding software patents (and other similar IP patents).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20100628100422167">http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20100628100422167</a></p>
<p>There is a large legal door being left open here, but this is still an important decision regarding software patents (and other similar IP patents).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.babler.us/michael/2010/06/28/this-is-important-software-patents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

